<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>State Feed: Wisconsin</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/Wisconsin/rss</link>
 <description>State RSS Feeds</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Wisconsin Voters Want Direct Say in Government</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/press-releases/wisconsin-voters-want-direct-say-in-government</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;(MADISON, WI) – The overwhelming majority of Wisconsinites want a direct say in government through statewide initiative and referendum rights, according to a recent poll.&lt;br /&gt;Citizens in Charge Foundation, a national voter rights group focused on the ballot initiative and referendum process and the John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy, a free market think tank in Wisconsin, released the results of an opinion poll conducted in the state on voter support for initiative and referendum rights. The results were clear, with 63% of voters supporting and only 16% opposing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/press-releases/wisconsin-voters-want-direct-say-in-government&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:28:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3021 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Citizens&#039; Rights Safe in Many States as State Legislatures End Sessions</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/brandon/citizens-rights-safe-in-many-states-as-state-legislatures-end-sessions</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of the 45 states whose legislatures &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.multistate.com/site.nsf/sessions2010?OpenPage&quot;&gt;hold sessions&lt;/a&gt; in 2010, 27 of them have adjourned for the year, and 5 more will wrap up before the end of the month. Of the more than 80 bills dealing with the initiative and referendum process in various states, 51 of them would have reduced citizens’ initiative rights. Thanks to the work of activists in our coalitions, only 3 bills reducing citizen’s rights have passed and become law.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/brandon/citizens-rights-safe-in-many-states-as-state-legislatures-end-sessions&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/brandon/citizens-rights-safe-in-many-states-as-state-legislatures-end-sessions#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/alabama/news">Alabama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/arizona/news">Arizona</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/california/news">California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/colorado/news">Colorado</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/delaware/news">Delaware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/illinois/news">Illinois</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/maine/news">Maine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/maryland/news">Maryland</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/minnesota/news">Minnesota</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/missouri/news">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/nebraska/news">Nebraska</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/new-hampshire/news">New Hampshire</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/new-jersey/news">New Jersey</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/new-york/news">New York</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/ohio/news">Ohio</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/oklahoma/news">Oklahoma</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/oregon/news">Oregon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/pennsylvania/news">Pennsylvania</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/rhode-island/news">Rhode Island</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/south-carolina/news">South Carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/utah/news">Utah</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/vermont/news">Vermont</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/washington/news">Washington</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/west-virginia/news">West Virginia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wyoming/news">Wyoming</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/national/news">National</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 14:23:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2878 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How We Helped Expand Petitioning Rights in Wisconsin</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/orville-seymer/how-we-helped-expand-petitioning-rights-in-wisconsin</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Several years ago while myself and several other Wisconsin activists were working on the recall of a City of Milwaukee Alderman, the recall effort was going on during a regularly scheduled election so we told the group collecting signatures to stand just outside of the polling locations and approach the voters as they were going in to vote. This seemed like a simple and easy way to gather signatures because all of those going in to vote were residents of the district of the alderman that we were attempting to recall.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/orville-seymer/how-we-helped-expand-petitioning-rights-in-wisconsin&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/orville-seymer/how-we-helped-expand-petitioning-rights-in-wisconsin#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/recall">Recall</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:00:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2698 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Milwaukee Editorial Couldn&#039;t Be More Wrong</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/orville-seymer/milwaukee-editorial-couldnt-be-more-wrong</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Last Sunday the &lt;em&gt;Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel&lt;/em&gt; ran &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/65849487.html&quot;&gt;an editorial&lt;/a&gt; blatantly attacking the citizens and their powers of local direct initiative and recall. My response, which is copied below to the ridiculous claims of the &lt;em&gt;Journal-Sentinel &lt;/em&gt;were published in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/66167227.html&quot;&gt;today&amp;#8217;s edition&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;headline&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Recalls, Direct Legislation Are Vital&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/orville-seymer/milwaukee-editorial-couldnt-be-more-wrong&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/orville-seymer/milwaukee-editorial-couldnt-be-more-wrong#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/direct-initiative">direct initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/direct-legislation">direct legislation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/milwaukee">milwaukee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/opinion">opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/petition">petition</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/recall">Recall</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:52:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2034 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Progressivism in Wisconsin never led to initiative &amp; referendum rights</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/trevorf/progressivism-in-wisconsin-never-led-to-initiative-referendum-rights</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The name Wisconsin is practically synonymous with Progressivism, yet&lt;br /&gt;this state has never had a statewide initiative and referendum process.&lt;br /&gt;Indeed, it is one of only three states where voters turned down their&lt;br /&gt;opportunity to get it (Texas and Rhode Island are the others). The&lt;br /&gt;circumstances were as follows.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In 1907 Lieutenant Governor W. D. Connor and State Senator W. D.&lt;br /&gt;Brazeau took up the cause and secured approval in the state senate by a&lt;br /&gt;19 to 5 vote, but lost in the lower house. The Progressive reformers had&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/trevorf/progressivism-in-wisconsin-never-led-to-initiative-referendum-rights&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/trevorf/progressivism-in-wisconsin-never-led-to-initiative-referendum-rights#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/initiative">initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/referendum">referendum</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/wisconsin">wisconsin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/national/news">National</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:10:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1736 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Progressivism in Wisconsin never led to initiative &amp; referendum rights</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/trevorf/progressivism-in-wisconsin-never-led-to-initiative-referendum-rights</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The name Wisconsin is practically synonymous with Progressivism, yet&lt;br /&gt;this state has never had a statewide initiative and referendum process.&lt;br /&gt;Indeed, it is one of only three states where voters turned down their&lt;br /&gt;opportunity to get it (Texas and Rhode Island are the others). The&lt;br /&gt;circumstances were as follows.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In 1907 Lieutenant Governor W. D. Connor and State Senator W. D.&lt;br /&gt;Brazeau took up the cause and secured approval in the state senate by a&lt;br /&gt;19 to 5 vote, but lost in the lower house. The Progressive reformers had&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/trevorf/progressivism-in-wisconsin-never-led-to-initiative-referendum-rights&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/trevorf/progressivism-in-wisconsin-never-led-to-initiative-referendum-rights#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/initiative">initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/referendum">referendum</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/wisconsin">wisconsin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/national/news">National</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:10:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1736 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Merger petition will be certified for two Wisconsin school districts</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/merger-petition-will-be-certified-for-two-wisconsin-school-districts</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The effort to put a school merger on the ballot is being tested. A petition to have residents in both the Chetek and Weyerhaeuser school districts vote on a merger between the two is being certified Thursday night. The two school boards recently voted to consolidate next July. A petition to send that decision to a referendum then started going around Weyerhaeuser.   The petition was turned in with 132 signatures. Only 52 valid signatures are needed to put the merger on the ballot. That petition is being certified.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/merger-petition-will-be-certified-for-two-wisconsin-school-districts&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/source/wqow-18">WQOW 18</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:16:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1658 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Power of Recall</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/brandon/the-power-of-recall</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One powerful citizen tool that we don&amp;#8217;t talk about as much here on the CICF Blog is the power of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ballotpedia.com/wiki/index.php/Recall&quot;&gt;recall&lt;/a&gt;. Recall allows voters to remove a particularly unresponsive, corrupt, or even unpopular elected official from office before their term is up. Citizens in 18 states have the power to recall state-level officials. Many other local jurisdictions give their voters recall powers as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/brandon/the-power-of-recall&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/brandon/the-power-of-recall#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/recall">Recall</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/recall-election">recall election</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/national/news">National</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:43:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1465 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> Speed cameras on U.S. highways?</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/speed-cameras-on-us-highways</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Lawmakers in Wisconsin, Ohio, Montana and Mississippi failed to get a freeway speed camera measure onto a ballot, but points to Maryland as an example of lawmakers&amp;#8217; success. He says 13 states have specific laws banning freeway cameras, but he sees a natural progression from states using red-light cameras to using freeway speed cameras.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/wayoflife/06/04/aa.speed.cameras.highways/&quot;&gt;Read the story from CNN&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/ballot-initiative">ballot initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/ballot-measure">ballot measure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/source/cnn">CNN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/maryland/news">Maryland</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/mississippi/news">Mississippi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/montana/news">Montana</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/ohio/news">Ohio</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/national/news">National</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:21:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1268 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Referendum results will play a part in Wisconsin gun debate</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/referendum-results-will-play-a-part-in-wisconsin-gun-debate</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Kenosha area lawmakers are lining up behind a recent legal opinion confirming the legality of toting unconcealed firearms in public places.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kenoshanews.com/news/bearing_arms_gun_memo_may_reopen_concealed_controversy_4827061.html&quot;&gt;Read the story from &lt;em&gt;Kenosha News&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/source/kenosha-news">Kenosha News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:51:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1149 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Voters Weigh in on Wisconsin Referendums</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/voters-weigh-in-on-wisconsin-referendums</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In addition to electing two statewide offices and several local races, Wisconsinites voted on several referendums Tuesday. Voters in six school districts weighed in on funding referendums.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.channel3000.com/politics/19096062/detail.html&quot;&gt;Read the story from WISC-TV&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/local-government">local government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/referendum">referendum</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/source/wisc-tv">WISC-TV</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:44:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1018 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Group Effort to Recall Wisconsin Governor</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/group-effort-to-recall-wisconsin-governor</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A group of Wisconsinites has formed a committee to explore recalling governor Jim Doyle. Recall supporters would need to collect over 500,000 signatures within 60 days of formally beginning their collection efforts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kenoshanews.com/news/group_starts_effort_to_recall_governor_doyle_4668585.html&quot;&gt;Read the story from the &lt;em&gt;Kenosha News&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/source/kenosha-news">Kenosha News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/recall">Recall</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:00:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1001 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Federal Court Invalidates Wisconsin Finance Reporting Restrictions</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/brandon/federal-court-invalidates-wisconsin-finance-reporting-restrictions</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A federal district court ruled has ruled that Wisconsin&amp;#8217;s campaign finance reporting requirements are overly restrictive on First Amendment rights in a case arising from a referendum campaign. According to Wisconsin&amp;#8217;s election law, two Whitewater citizens who sought to distribute flyers and yard signsagainst a local referendum would have had to register with the state and comply with a host of other reporting regulations. The citizens brought suit and won, striking down the restrictions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/brandon/federal-court-invalidates-wisconsin-finance-reporting-restrictions&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/blog/brandon/federal-court-invalidates-wisconsin-finance-reporting-restrictions#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:02:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">955 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Appleton referendum tops today&#039;s primary election ballot</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/appleton-referendum-tops-todays-primary-election-ballot</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Based on ballot measures, voters in Appleton and Grand Chute figure to have the highest turnouts today in the Fox Cities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/appleton-referendum-tops-todays-primary-election-ballot&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/ballot-initiative">ballot initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/election">election</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/initiative">initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/source/the-post-crescent">The Post-Crescent</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:05:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">868 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Citizen group files court challenge on TIF petition</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/citizen-group-files-court-challenge-on-tif-petition</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not satisfied with the city’s response to its petition drive, citizen group Glosta Tea Party filed a lawsuit against Gloucester officials on Friday, Feb. 6 asking for a suspension of the tax incentive plan brokered between the city and developers of Gloucester Crossing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A hearing set for Tuesday, Feb. 10, in Salem’s Essex Superior Court was delayed until March 18 after the city requested more time to prepare its case.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Jamie O’Hara, a lead organizer of Glosta Tea Party, said his group was caught off guard by the city’s move.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/citizen-group-files-court-challenge-on-tif-petition&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/local-government">local government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/massachusetts/news">Massachusetts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/tax">tax</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/west-virginia/news">West Virginia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:22:51 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">614 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> Petition seeks referendum on spending</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/petition-seeks-referendum-on-spending</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A petition with more than 400 signatures calls for the Village of North Fond du Lac to go to referendum for all future expenditures that exceed $1 million.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The petition was filed in the village office on Thursday, just one day after a heated public hearing during which officials moved plans forward, despite some citizen opposition, for a $37 million lakeside hotel/convention center/marina.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/petition-seeks-referendum-on-spending&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/petition-seeks-referendum-on-spending#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/city-government">City Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:59:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">375 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> Change of government drive stalls, ballot measure won&#039;t happen</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/change-of-government-drive-stalls-ballot-measure-wont-happen</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A citizens group has decided that it will not pursue an April referendum that would ask voters if they want to change the city&amp;#8217;s form of government.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/news/change-of-government-drive-stalls-ballot-measure-wont-happen#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/tags/city-government">City Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org/states/wisconsin/news">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 08:10:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">248 at http://www.citizensinchargefoundation.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

